Top Social

Image Slider

Showing posts with label #YOAreadalong. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #YOAreadalong. Show all posts

#YOAreadalong Discussion 3: And Then There Were None

6.02.2016
(image from agathachristie.com)
Hello everyone!

We are hard at work finishing this week's read Death on the Nile (spoiler alert: IT'S A GOOD ONE), but wanted to let everyone know that we will be reading Dame Agatha's supreme classic, And Then There Were None in just a few short weeks and would like to invite one and all to read along with us! To that end, we've gone ahead and put some thought into discussion ideas for the upcoming #YOAreadalong.

Per usual, let's use this post to add comments/discuss our thoughts and feelings. We know so many of you Agatha Christie fans have already enjoyed this one, so we can't wait to hear from more of you about it! We will not be having a giveaway with this particular readalong because we are waiting on a REALLY EXCITING surprise item for the next giveaway, which we hope to announce soon!

In the meantime, let's talk about And Then There Were None here! We will be posting our final recap/review on June 20th!

Characters:
>this book is PACKED with characters. Any of them stand out to you as particularly interesting?
>anyone seem particularly guilty or suspicious?

#MURDER:
>spoiler alert: people die in this book. Who do you think/did you think will be the first to go?

Story:
>beginning, middle, and end: what do you think is going on!?!
>Some of you may be familiar with the fact that this story has actually had different endings at different points in time. Any thoughts on which one you preferred, or which one seems more classically Agatha??

As always, be advised: everyone is reading at their own pace so spoilers may be inevitable! Post and read at your own risk! :)

Happy reading!
A. & E.

Planes, Trains, and Poirot: Murder on the Orient Express #YOAReadalong | 1934

5.16.2016
(photo from folio society)
"'You do not understand, Monsieur. I have been very fortunate in my profession. I have made enough money to satisfy both my needs and my caprices. I take now only such cases as—interest me.'" 
- Hercule Poirot, Murder on the Orient Express, p. 36

We have had such a wonderful time so far this week reading Murder on the Orient Express with so many of you! If you are still working on reading it, be sure to post a comment about it on this post or our previous post by midnight EST this Friday, May 20, to be entered to win our latest giveaway! We have loved reading the thoughts of those of you who've already posted. We will post the winner on Saturday the 21st!

The Sum of It:
For those of you who haven't read Orient Express, a quick recap! Poirot is on his way home from a little detective work in Syria via train and after a few connections, finds himself getting (literally) the last bunk on the Orient Express, thanks to meeting up with his convenient bff, M. Bouc, a director of the train company. The train is full of an eclectic mix of passengers, so much so that M. Bouc comments as their journey begins about the unique nature of a train to bring together such a mix of classes, countries, and ages: Russian countesses, Swedish missionaries, British officers, and a rich, unpleasant American man named Ratchett. Ratchett approaches Poirot about a vague job of figuring out who is threatening his life, but Poirot is like uh thanks, but no thanks, I am rich and famous enough to not take lame jobs and also I don't like your face (he literally says that #burn). But of course, who turns up #MURDERED? Old Mr. Ratchett. But is his name actually Ratchett? Or does he have a more sinister name (and past!) to discover? And who on the train would want him dead?

Poirot (sans Hastings again! Sad day!) teams up with M. Bouc and a Greek doctor named Constantine to investigate the case. But this is a confounding one. Everyone has an alibi (or do they!?), everyone has heard or seen something different (or have they!?), and who owns the red kimono dressing gown!?! And did we mention all this is happening while the train is stuck in a snowdrift in the middle of Yugoslavia?

The YOA Treatment:
This one is a classic for a reason. The first time you read (or watch) this tale, the complexity of the situation is truly baffling until finally at the end it starts to dawn on you what must almost certainly be the case. This tale is a showcase for Poirot's intuition, and the fact that it's a bit of a bottle episode requires him to lean all the more on his powers of deduction. The characters in this story are also so rich and interesting, so much so that one big reveal (amid several) at the end literally caused both of us to say "whaaaaat!" And we have both read and watched this tale before! The unique setting, a glamorous train trapped in the silent cold of an Eastern European snowbank, certainly enhances the tale.

Interestingly, the book comes across much lighter in tone (aside from the sad backstory) than the David Suchet movie portrayal and interpretation, which has always made us think of this as another super-somber Poirot tale. In the movie, Poirot's morality is much more of a distressing additional character than in the book, where he strikes a bit of a different tone at the end, which honestly feels more like Agatha's own sense of right and wrong than the heavy moralistic attitude we see in the film.

The adorable interpretation of Agatha's early thoughts on setting a mystery aboard the Orient Express from one of our new favorite things, Agatha: The Real Life of Agatha Christie (by Martinetti, Lebeau, and Franc)
One thing that has been interesting to discover as we read through all of Agatha's books this year is which ones she actually liked to read herself. Luckily, such a list exists! Agatha Christie author and expert (#goals) John Curran writes about this in his book Agatha Christie: Murder in the Making:

In February 1972, in reply to a Japanese fan, she listed, with brief comments, her favourite books. but she makes an important point when she writes that her list of favourites would 'vary from time to time, as every now and then I re-read an early book…and then I alter my opinion, sometimes thinking that it is much better than I thought it was - or nor as good as I had thought'. Although the choices are numbered it is not clear if they are in order of preference; she adds brief comments and reiterates her earlier point when she heads the list:

At the moment my own list would possibly be:
And Then There Were None- 'a difficult technique which was a challenge…'
The Murder of Roger Ackroyd- 'a general favourite…'
A Murder is Announced- 'all the characters interesting…'
Murder on the Orient Express- '…it was a new idea for a plot.'
The Thirteen Problems- 'a good series of short stories.'
Towards Zero- '…interesting idea of people from different places coming towards a murder instead of starting with the murder and working from that.'
Endless Night- 'my own favourite at present.'
Crooked House- '…a study of a certain family interesting to explore.'
Ordeal by Innocence- 'an idea I had for some time before starting to work upon it.'
The Moving Finger- 're-read lately and enjoyed reading it again, very much.'

It has been so wonderful this year to, like Agatha, go back through her books to remember old favorites and find new ones. We agree with her that Murder on the Orient Express deserves a place on our favorites list!

-A. & E.

PS: Here's a fun article about some interesting casting ideas for Kenneth Branagh's new film adaptation of Orient Express!

Papa Poirot Gets Protective: Peril at End House | 1931

3.28.2016
(image from here)
"You are in danger - grave danger. I tell to you. I! And you do not know who I am?" -Hercule Poirot, Peril at End House, p. 23

We have come to the end of our first #YOAreadalong! Thanks so much to those of you who read Peril at End House with us this week - it was so fun to hear your thoughts and become better acquainted over Agatha! Also - stay tuned for the winner of our #giveaway announcement in the next few days! And, for those of you who haven't had a chance to read Peril yet, fear not! We will still give you our recap for this week, and you can join us for our next #YOAreadalong, Murder on the Orient Express!

The Sum of It:
Hercule Poirot is still "retired", but is happily reunited with his bestie Hastings for a seaside vacay. While getting their resort on, Poirot literally stumbles upon a cute girl named Nick Buckley who, while they are chatting, is nearly killed by a stray bullet. Poirot is obviously concerned for her safety and goes into full Papa Poirot mode and makes it his life mission to keep her out of harm's way. Nick is a little apprehensive (and sassy) at first about this total random foreign stranger making his way into her life and insisting that someone is trying to #MURDER her, but after Poirot has Hastings explain to Nick just exactly who they are dealing with (THE Poirot!), she takes him seriously.

Poirot suggests she find a fairly dull, yet reliable, friend to come stay with her to make sure there's no more attempted murder funny business going on so Nick says I HAVE JUST THE GIRL! Aka, her cousin Maggie. However, Cousin Maggie has been at Nick's fairly crumbly mansion, End House, for not even 24 hours when she is found #MURDERED, and apparently mistaken for Nick when she is killed! Poirot, feeling fairly devastated that he was not able to prevent this death from happening under his nose, vows to track down the killer before they are able to knock off their intended target.

Nick has surrounded herself with quite the cast of characters who sound like a real bunch of #newromantics in her crumbly old house, including Nick's cousin Mr. Vyse, a lawyer whom Hastings is immediately suspicious of on account of his being a lawyer and having blonde hair and an impassive face, Commander Challenger, a stalwart military man with a suntanned face and a not-so-secret love for Nick, Freddie (aka Frederica), Nick's alternatively zen and spastic (#cocaine) bff, and Mr. Lazarus, a glamorous and wealthy art dealer who is Freddie's not-so-secret man on the side. Nick is renting the lodge on her property to some VERY AUSTRALIAN AUSTRALIANS (Poirot finds them suspicious because they seem toooo sincere). Some characters outside the frame include Nick's secret lover, a wealthy, Lindbergh-style pilot trying to fly around the world, and Freddie's erstwhile husband. We also get to see Inspector Japp!

To help with sorting out all the potential suspects, Poirot creates a list of possible baddies, A-J, item J being someone who exists but is unknown. Nick gets locked up in a hospital (for her own protection), and Poirot gets down to business with the investigating, at one point even making Hastings pretend to be a medium conducting a seance (blessed Hastings), before revealing a red herring or two AND surprising everyone with the #DARKTRUTH in the end.

Because that's what we all do on our seaside vacays.

The YOA Treatment:
Though there are a million things we could touch on, we want to leave some of the discussion to you guys! A few things we want to highlight:

>The Agatha Wrap Up: one of the things that is just so deliciously satisfying about Agatha Christie novels is how you rarely (if ever!) have lingering questions after you finish the book. Each detail of the storyline is there for a reason, and if it isn't there to bring color or character to the plot, you're going to find out why it's included before the book is done. One reader (Kelly) pointed out that Agatha goes to the trouble of resolving a minor, minor plot point at the very end of Peril and how pleasant it is to end on that kind of note.

>Sassy Poirot: Poirot is particularly sassy in this book. He and Hastings have their typical bickering, but it's at new heights during their End House adventures. Poirot is calling Hastings his "faithful dog", turning up his nose at English breakfasts, and makes a passionate plea for Hastings to get a Poirot-esque mustache (and to part his hair in the middle so as to be more symmetrical and aesthetically pleasing). Hastings observes that he repressed a "shudder at the thought." We also get some standard Poirot-to-Hastings zingers, including: "Hastings has a singularly beautiful nature. It has been the greatest hindrance to me at times." Of himself, Poirot cutely says, "I am convinced that le bon Dieu created Hercule Poirot for the express purpose of interfering. It is my metier."

>Classic Hastings: Hastings has previously revealed himself to be 100% certain of many things, and as a general rule he is almost always wrong and then totally baffled by his own wrongness. Poirot has picked up on this trend, saying to his friend after a particularly certain character assessment: "You have an extraordinary effect on me, Hastings. You have so strongly the flair in the wrong direction that I am almost tempted to go by it!" Hastings also recounts his own bafflement in an adorable story about Poirot's one failed case, saying "And I smiled, for at the time that Poirot told me that tale, he had instructed me to say "chocolate box" to him if ever I should fancy he was growing conceited! He was then bitterly offended when I used the magical words only a minute and a quarter later." So mysterious can't imagine why Poirot was annoyed by that.

>Style: This feels like quintessential Agatha and Poirot. The storytelling is pretty tight, although not quite at its zenith, and the mystery offers the classic set of twists at the end that leave you marveling at Agatha's creativity. Though some of the red herrings just FEEL like red herrings, it's fantastic how she ties them into the story so that even though they're not the main solution to the mystery, they are a part of the whole in a really clever way.

We also get a little more of a look into some of the big questions one could consider in mystery writing. In her autobiography, Agatha mentions that she is much more interested in the victim of the crime than the perpetrator. In this book, Poirot shares this perspective as he is discussing one of the many attempts on Nick's life, saying to her "For me -- I have different work to perform. I have the innocent to think of, not the guilty -- the victim, not the criminal." But this doesn't mean that Poirot isn't also trying to get into the psyche of the murderer. As he is trying to work through all his theories with the trusty Hastings, he exclaims "Motive!", saying "Let us come back to that, and regard this problem calmly and methodically. To begin with, how many kinds of motive are there for murder? What are the motives which lead one human being to take another human being's life?"

What did you love or hate about the book?? If this is your first Agatha reading experience, are you hooked? Did you already run out to your local book store or fire up the ol' Amazon account and grab some more? Will you join us for our next #YOAreadalong?? TELL US ALL YOUR THOUGHTZ AND FEELINGZ!!